eHealthMobile HealthSocial MediaTechnology

Chat 129: An Apps Pharmacy Coming to a Neighbourhood Near You?

fannygillet
7 Min Read

By Fanny Gillet and edited by Colleen Young

By Fanny Gillet and edited by Colleen Young

On Wednesday 22nd, hcsmca-ers put themselves in a large academic health center CIO’s shoes to imagine what health care application they would recommend for patients use. Co–moderators, Mark Casselman (@markcasselman) and Will Falk (@willfalk), started the discussion by sharing 5 background facts:

  1. Hospitals, doctors, nurses, researchers, patient groups, and developers are rapidly developing apps. 1000’s of apps available.
  2. How to direct patients to apps? Need to construct Apps delivery system. HC organizations develop & publish an “App Formulary”.
  3. #appsformulary provides physicians with list of applications that have been tested and approved for use by their patients.
  4. …and for consumers to easily identify and access health and fitness apps that are credible and well-designed.
  5. We need process & standards for selection, & taxonomy for regulation of apps. Some OTC, some prescription, some “front of store”

And so the question was posed:

More Read

State by State Telemedicine Licensure

The Top 5 Very Important Reasons To Learn CPR
Compliance Does Not Equal Security: 3 Emerging Security Themes in Healthcare
Connected Health as a Therapeutic
Doctors Must Address Physical, Emotional Concerns With Women’s Hair Loss

T1: Imagine you are #CIO* of large academic health center – what apps would you put in apps pharmacy for patients? #hcsmca #appsformulary *CIO = Chief Information Officer

The first applications mentioned were those related to quitting smoking. Should these applications be used without healthcare professional supervision and collaboration?

Should access to medical applications available in the Application Formulary be controlled and monitored? For example, following the example of over-the-counter drugs vs. prescription drugs, some applications could only be downloaded by “prescription” or with a patient ID number.

Then chat participants raised the question of approval and regulation – By whom and how?
Some chat members suggested patients as well as healthcare providers should be part of the approval team, adding that users (both patients and professionals) could and should participate in co-designing applications.

Medical colleges and associations consult each other but each have clear responsibilities. Associations rarely set regulations, Pat Rich (@cmaer) went on to say.

Chat members raisedconcerns about clinicians endorsing applications. Some were afraid that there would be a lack of transparency. That’s why @markcasselman suggested the creation of a specific committee that included people with a variety of backgrounds.

We saw that, to be useful as a communication tool, healthcare providers should examine and analyze data gathered by patients via prescribed or recommended applications. However, some hcsmca-ers maintained that not all data needed to be shared and that self-monitoring tools can be equally useful. Chat members talked about portals where patients and doctors could share data, providing they are secure.

Some chat members said that the wayfinding applications have proven to be very useful for visitors to hospitals, especially if they were regularly updated and included anomalies such as temporary clinic relocations and renovations, etc.

Hcsmca-ers talked about applications that could be used for dementia to help caregivers or patients at early stages, for example reminders or GPS trackers.

Finally, chat participants underlined the importance of helping patients to find and filter applications. That can be the role of the local libraries, community centers and local applications developers.

During the discussion hcsmca-ers shared the following:

Applications

Articles about apps

Here’s the full transcript of the chat.

What apps would you give a thumbs up? Which ones get a thumbs down?

TAGGED:
Share This Article
Exit mobile version