We use cookies, including third-party cookies from Google to serve personalized ads through AdSense, to operate this site and understand how it is used. By continuing to browse, you accept this use. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use for details, including how to opt out of personalized advertising.
Accept
Health Works CollectiveHealth Works CollectiveHealth Works Collective
  • Health
    • Mental Health
  • Policy and Law
    • Global Healthcare
    • Medical Ethics
  • Medical Innovations
  • News
  • Wellness
  • Tech
Search
© 2023 HealthWorks Collective. All Rights Reserved.
Reading: Plan B’s Balancing Act
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
Health Works CollectiveHealth Works Collective
Font ResizerAa
Search
Follow US
  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy
© 2023 HealthWorks Collective. All Rights Reserved.
Health Works Collective > Policy & Law > Health Reform > Plan B’s Balancing Act
Health ReformMedical EthicsNewsPolicy & LawPublic Health

Plan B’s Balancing Act

Liz Seegert
Liz Seegert
Share
3 Min Read
SHARE

The FDA’s recent ruling allowing the Plan B emergency contraceptive to be sold over the counter to anyone over age 15 naturally has both critics www.modernhealthcare.com/article/20130430/INFO/304309979?AllowView=VW8xUmo5Q21TcWJOb1gzb0tNN3RLZ0h0MWg5SVgra3NZRzROR3l0WWRMWGJVUDRCRWxIeU96eTMyWmV2NUh3WUpidW8=&utm_source=link-20130430-INFO-304309979&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=am” target=”_blank”>recent ruling allowing the Plan B emergency contraceptive to be sold over the counter to anyone over age 15 naturally has both critics plan band supporters buzzing.

In a statement, Planned Parenthood Federation of America President Cecile Richards called the ruling an “important step forward to expand access to emergency contraception” that will help more women prevent unintended pregnancies. She also called for lifting “all unnecessary restrictions to emergency contraception, consistent with the prevailing science and medicine.”

Earlier this month, a federal judge struck down age restrictions on Plan B and ordered that it must be made available to all women without a prescription. Judge Edward Korman accused the Obama administration of playing politics after HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius overrode a previous FDA decision to make the pill more widely available to more young women. Until now, only women age 17 and older could obtain Plan B without a prescription.

This FDA decision is separate from Korman’s ruling, and is based on an application by the manufacturer, Teva Pharmaceuticals, citing additional evidence supporting lowering the age of non-prescription availability.

More Read

Engaging Specialty Practices in the Patient Centered Medical Neighborhood
Debunking Digital Patient Recruitment Myths for Clinical Trials: Myth #2
Exercise, Diabetes, Cancer and Autophagy: A Fascinating Connection
What Does Science Say About Modern Health Practices?
Shareholders’ Agreement Benefits for Family-Owned Healthcare Firms

Anne Higgins, of the conservative Family Research Council, said the health of young girls is now at risk. “Making Plan B available for girls under the age of 17 without a prescription flies in the face of medical information and sound judgment. I am very troubled that the court has not fully taken into account the concerns expressed by HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius and many public health advocates that there is not enough data on the health effects of Plan B on young girls.”

However FDA Commissioner Margaret Hamberg, MD, who supported the agency’s earlier decision to lift all age restrictions, said “the data reviewed by the agency demonstrated that women 15 years of age and older were able to understand how Plan B One-Step works, how to use it properly, and that it does not prevent the transmission of a sexually transmitted disease.”

Teva is working on packaging that alerts cashiers to require proof of age from consumers. Meanwhile, there’s no word yet on whether the Obama Administration will appeal Judge Korman’s order to lift all age restrictions. They have until May 5 to do so. Otherwise the ruling stands.

Not surprisingly, reaction from parents was mixed. What do you think? Post a comment below to share your thoughts.

Share This Article
Facebook Copy Link Print
Share

Stay Connected

1.5KFollowersLike
4.5KFollowersFollow
2.8KFollowersPin
136KSubscribersSubscribe

Latest News

Flat editorial illustration: The article connects routine visual inspection and accurate barrier fit with protection of peristoma
Peristomal Skin Care: Healthy Skin, Irritation Causes, and When to See a WOC Nurse
Health Nursing
November 2, 2026
Flat editorial illustration: Clinical-trial operations editorial illustration combining healthcare and technology: country-specif
Clinical Study Operations Across Eastern European Research Markets
Health
October 31, 2026
Flat editorial illustration: A health-editorial scene of a first pain-management visit, bringing together attentive consultation,
What to Expect at Your First Pain Management Appointment
Therapies Wellness
October 29, 2026
Flat editorial illustration: The core relationship is medication-only coverage versus coverage for a supervised clinical program.
Medical Weight Loss as a Workplace Benefit: The Questions I Would Want Asked
Weight Loss Wellness
October 29, 2026

You Might also Like

Healthcare Spend at Historic Low

August 8, 2011
health policy sequestration
BusinessFinanceHealth ReformHospital AdministrationNewsPolicy & LawPublic Health

Sequestration and Healthcare: What Organizations are Affected? (Part 1)

March 15, 2013

Making Patients With Devices Less Dependent on Doctors

August 15, 2012
Health care

What To Know About Current Trends In Healthcare And Aging

September 6, 2018
Subscribe
Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!
Follow US
© 2008-2026 HealthWorks Collective. All Rights Reserved.
  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?