(Editor’s Note: John Nosta writes for Forbes under the heading, “Health Critical”)
…please be aware that the nearest exit row might be behind you
The AED in a public space. Source: Wikipedia
(Editor’s Note: John Nosta writes for Forbes under the heading, “Health Critical”)
…please be aware that the nearest exit row might be behind you
The AED in a public space. Source: Wikipedia
The exit row on an airplane is an essential bit of knowledge that many passengers fail to identify or even consider. I, on the other hand, count the number of rows in front of or behind me as part of my emergency exit strategy. Most people are too busy or distracted to pay attention to flight safety information and exit rows and life preservers are just part of the routine that goes unnoticed or ignored. However, in light of recent events at SFO, travelers may be rethinking some basic information about making travel more safe. And this got me thinking about another another safety story that’s out there and is similar to the often ignored safety information on an airplane. It’s something most people have seen, but (like an airplane crash) have never experienced: the automated external defibrillator (AED).
A life-saving device that goes largely unnoticed or ignored
The AED is a bit like the safety information card on an airplane. It’s there, but most don’t notice it. And there lies the tragedy of the AED–the time from its acute need (as in sudden cardiac arrest) to its use is far longer than that critical few minutes required to intervene when someone’s heart has stopped. Simply put, people fail to make the immediate connection to the AED and waste precous minutes in less-than-effective activities. Or even worse, a life-saving device stays in its display case. The automated defibrillator is only automated when it’s put in use! And that, for the vast majority of times, is rare.
Despite important advances in prevention, cardiac arrest remains a substantial public health problem and a leading cause of death in many parts of the world. Cardiac arrest occurs both in and out of the hospital. In the US and Canada, approximately 350 000 people/year (approximately half of them in-hospital) suffer a cardiac arrest and receive attempted resuscitation. This estimate does not include the substantial number of victims who suffer an arrest without attempted resuscitation. While attempted resuscitation is not always appropriate, there are many lives and life-years lost because appropriate resuscitation is not attempted.
The estimated incidence of EMS-treated out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in the US and Canada is about 50 to 55/100 000 persons/year and approximately 25% of these present with pulseless ventricular arrhythmias. The estimated incidence of in-hospital cardiac arrest is 3 to 6/1000 admissions and similarly, approximately 25% of these present with pulseless ventricular arrhythmias. Cardiac arrest victims who present with ventricular fibrillation or pulseless ventricular tachycardia have a substantially better outcome compared with those who present with asystole or pulseless electric activity.
The vast majority of cardiac arrest victims are adults, but thousands of infants and children suffer either an in-hospital or out-of-hospital cardiac arrest each year in the US and Canada.
Cardiac arrest continues to be an all-too-common cause of premature death, and small incremental improvements in survival can translate into thousands of lives saved every year.
It might seem odd, but the best place to have a cardiac arrest in America is a casino
How ironic. Casinos, with their extensive monitoring of gaming seems to offer one of the best chances for successful resuscitation. The rapid defibrillation by security officers provided impressive results that rival even the best of medical environments. The prospective study was published in the New England Journal of Medicine in 2000. And while it’s a few years old, the take-away is still valid.
Automated external defibrillators were used, 105 patients whose initial cardiac rhythm was ventricular fibrillation. Fifty-six of the patients 153 percent) survived to discharge from the hospital. Among the 90 patients whose collapse was witnessed (86 percent), the clinically relevant time intervals were a mean (+/-SD) of 3.5+/-2.9 minutes from collapse to attachment of the defibrillator, 4.4+/-2.9 minutes from collapse to the delivery of the first defibrillation shock, and 9.8+/-4.3 minutes from collapse to The arrival of the paramedics. The survival rate was 74 percent for those who received their first defibrillation no later than three minutes after a witnessed collapse and 49 percent for those who received their first defibrillation after more than three minutes.
Beyond exit rows, airplanes have AED’s too!
Even the use of AED’s have be studied on airplanes. And interestingly, the value was clearly demostrated in an impressive analysis of 200 traveler patients. The reality is that in almost any place or situation, the AED is a life-saving device that offer the best chance at survival–even at 30,000 feet.
The use of the automated external defibrillator aboard commercial aircraft is effective, with an excellent rate of survival to discharge from the hospital after conversion of ventricular fibrillation. There are not likely to be complications when the device is used as a monitor in the absence of ventricular fibrillation.
A call to clinical arms.
So, the next time you’re on an airplane, it might serve a valuable purpose to listen and read the safety information. But just as importantly, the next trip to the mall or ball game can provide another another chance to help save a life. The recognition of “those AED’s” that rest dormant on walls and kiosks are the first step in the chain of events in the management of a sudden cardiac death. And because the first few minutes are so essential to a successful outcome, the citizen’s role in this major public health issue is essential.
Special thanks to Tom Bouthillet for his valuable insights and contributions to this story. Tom is a Fire Captain / Paramedic with Hilton Head Island Fire & Rescue, Editor-in-Chief of the EMS 12-Lead blog and podcast, host of the Code STEMI web series on First Responders Network, a member of the Editoral Advisory Board of EMS World Magazine, a member of the EMS Advisory Panel of the American Heart Association , a columnist for EMS1.com, an EMS 10 Award recipient and developer of the 12-Lead ECG Challenge smartphone app.